“If a man is valuable, his deeds will in some way outlive his life.” -Bill Loftus, Inventor

The Financial Freedom Foundation (F3) is a non-profit organization that teaches people how to create more passive income than their living expenses, so that they can quit living for a job and start dedicating their time and talents to giving back.

Personal financial independence is necessary in order to free up your time. However, financial independence is not the end goal, but rather an initial step, just the beginning step.

We’ll show you how to create $10k/month in passive income, so that you can cover your living expenses and quit your job, and then another $20k/month+ on top of that, so that you can have funds for helping other people. We have the tools to accomplish this, and we’ll show you exactly how to implement them. Money is very scalable, so you can actually get up into the millions, which will happen as your vision for what you want to accomplish increases.

Instead of trying to get wealthy people to become generous, we are teaching generous people how to create and control wealth, so that they can help others.

As to becoming a member in our Mastermind Group, we do not have any preferences as to age, gender, race, religion, level of education, or nationality … however, we are seeking people who:

• Are self-driven, independent thinkers who are decision makers
• Are happy living a moderate lifestyle, even if they were to make $1 million monthly
• Sincerely want to give back and help others
• Care about people more than they care about things
• Do not really care for status symbols, like yachts, mansions, or fancy cars
• Do not seek for the glory of the world, nor power, nor fame
• View money as a stewardship rather than a prize
• View money as a tool rather than a goal
• Are comfortable taking initiative, calling the shots, and not having a boss
• Can create their own vision and run their own humanitarian projects
• Are okay with giving anonymously and not having the spotlight trained on them
• Are willing to learn

If this does not describe you, don’t bother to continue reading.

If this does describe you, then please download the information in our Free Report and continue forward in our screening process.

We hand select people to join our Mastermind Group. If you would like to be considered, we ask you to:

1. Read our Free Reports,
2. Read our Details page, and
3. Complete the essays in our Membership Application Form

(The links to access the Details page and the Membership Application Form are found in the Free Reports, which you can access by entering your Name and Email address in the box to the upper right and clicking the “Give Me My Free Report Now” button)

We believe that it is the personal responsibility of private citizens to care for the poor, the hungry, the homeless, the sick, and the elderly. We invite people to take more initiative in doing so, using their private sector skill sets to do this more effectively. We believe that the solutions to global poverty, world hunger, homelessness, and almost all our social, physical, mental, and economic problems rest in the hearts and minds of private individuals acting generously.

If you are ready to move to the next step, please download the Free Report now, using the box to the upper right.

“Never doubt that a small band of committed individuals can change the world. Indeed, it is the only thing that ever has.” -Margaret Mead












Legal Disclaimer: The Financial Freedom Foundation is not a United States Securities Dealer, Broker or US Investment Adviser. Forex, futures, stock, and options trading are not appropriate for everyone. Trading and investing in the stock, Forex, futures, and options markets have large potential rewards. However, there is also a substantial risk of loss associated with trading these markets. Losses can and will occur. You are solely responsible for any losses as a result of trading. Never put your money on the line without an understanding of what you are doing, and why you are doing it, based on your own personal knowledge and experience. Results, depicted above are unique to the user. Your personal results will vary. You could make more, less, or even lose money. No system or methodology has ever been developed that can guarantee profits. No representation or implication is being made that using the information will generate profits or ensure freedom from losses. Traders should consult their own financial advisers regarding any securities transaction, and be responsible for their own investment decisions.





Question by : “Let’s Move On” or “Let’s Move Forward” Is code for let’s not dwell on the truth? As in the case Rev. Wright
Or need to I say possibly Rev. Wrong!!! Oboma has a conundrum is he a racist or did just require to be accepted into the Black Community so Rev. Wright was the path to Chicago Black Community acceptance or is there a thing far more sinister lurking around the corner.
My hunch was correct. Barack would turn the tables.

Yes, Barack agreed, Wright’s statements had been “controversial,” and “divisive,” and “racially charged,” reflecting a “distorted view of America.”

But we ought to recognize the man in full and the black knowledge out of which the Rev. Wright came: 350 years of slavery and segregation.

Barack then listed black grievances and informed us what white America must do to close the racial divide and heal the country.

The “white community,” stated Barack, should start off “acknowledging that what ails the African-American community does not just exist in the minds of black individuals that the legacy of discrimination — and current incidents of discrimination, while much less overt than in the past — are genuine and should be addressed. Not just with words, but with deeds … .”

And what deeds must we carry out to heal ourselves and our country?

The “white community” should invest far more money in black schools and communities, enforce civil rights laws, ensure fairness in the criminal justice method and supply this generation of blacks with “ladders of opportunity” that had been “unavailable” to Barack’s and the Rev. Wright’s generations.

What is wrong with Barack’s prognosis and Barack’s remedy?

Only this. It is the very same old con, the identical old shakedown that black hustlers have been running since the Kerner Commission blamed the riots in Harlem, Watts, Newark, Detroit and a hundred other cities on, as Nixon put it, “everyone but the rioters themselves.”

Was “white racism” actually responsible for those black guys looting auto dealerships and liquor stories, and burning down their personal communities, as Otto Kerner stated — that liberal icon till the feds put him away for bribery.

Barack says we want to have a conversation about race in America.

Fair sufficient. But this time, it has to be a two-way conversation. White America wants to be heard from, not just lectured to.

This time, the Silent Majority requirements to have its convictions, grievances and demands heard. And amongst them are these:

Initial, America has been the greatest country on earth for black folks. It was right here that 600,000 black individuals, brought from Africa in slave ships, grew into a community of 40 million, had been introduced to Christian salvation, and reached the greatest levels of freedom and prosperity blacks have ever identified.

Wright ought to go down on his knees and thank God he is an American.

Second, no men and women anyplace has completed a lot more to lift up blacks than white Americans. Untold trillions have been spent since the ’60s on welfare, food stamps, rent supplements, Section 8 housing, Pell grants, student loans, legal services, Medicaid, Earned Income Tax Credits and poverty programs created to bring the African-American community into the mainstream.

Governments, companies and colleges have engaged in discrimination against white folks — with affirmative action, contract set-asides and quotas — to advance black applicants more than white applicants.

Churches, foundations, civic groups, schools and men and women all over America have donated time and income to support soup kitchens, adult education, day care, retirement and nursing houses for blacks.

We hear the grievances. Where is the gratitude?

Barack talks about new “ladders of opportunity” for blacks.

Let him go to Altoona and Johnstown, and ask the white kids in Catholic schools how a lot of had been visited lately by Ivy League recruiters handing out scholarships for “deserving” white children.

Is white America actually responsible for the truth that the crime and incarceration rates for African-Americans are seven instances those of white America? Is it truly white America’s fault that illegitimacy in the African-American community has hit 70 percent and the black dropout rate from high schools in some cities has reached 50 percent?

Is that the fault of white America or, initial and foremost, a failure of the black community itself?

As for racism, its ugliest manifestation is in interracial crime, and specially interracial crimes of violence. Is Barack Obama aware that even though white criminals choose black victims three percent of the time, black criminals pick white victims 45 percent of the time?

Is Barack aware that black-on-white rapes are 100 times more frequent than the reverse, that black-on-white robberies were 139 instances as common in the first 3 years of this decade as the reverse?

We have all heard ad nauseam from the Rev. Al about Tawana Brawley, the Duke rape case and Jena. And all turned out to be hoaxes. But about the epidemic of black assaults on whites that are genuine, we hear absolutely nothing.

Finest answer:

Answer by misterchipotle, esquire
yes, Obama is a racist. he hates white folks. even though his mom is white and his grandparents who raised him. yeah, he hates white folks.

do men and women like you think at all?

What do you think? Answer beneath!

Question by Righteousness, cover the Earth: Is “Volunteerism” a word?

Finest answer:

Answer by Bigmufasa
NounWikipedia has an article on:
Volunteerism
Singular
volunteerism
Plural
uncountable

volunteerism (uncountable)

(US) The reliance on volunteers to carry out an critical social or educational function

Give your answer to this question beneath!

Question by oohhbother: Can Hawthorn tree “volunteers” from seed be grown? Are they correct to the parent tree?
I do not know what kind of hawthorn I have but a lot of “volunteers” sprouted this year. I grew redbuds from sprouts this way and they turned out quite nice.

Best answer:

Answer by Cat
The Washington Hawthorn grows accurate from seed. Some of the thornless cultivars may possibly not I do not know.

What do you feel? Answer beneath!

Question by kangi_tu: What “modest acts of kindness” can I put in a coupon book for a specific somebody?
You can call him my soon to be bf )
I need to have many little things like “a single gentle kiss on cheek” and so on. from nice to maybe even naughty. Not certain whether or not you are allowed to put that on right here.
I need inspiration! Several pages to fill

Greatest answer:

Answer by Just Me Being Me
1 free “I’ll get up and get you whatever you want from the refrigerator”

This way when you are watching a film and he does not want to get up, you’ll go get it for him.

Know far better? Leave your own answer in the comments!

Question by mission_viejo_california: Who still believes International Warming is triggered by man?
International warming ethics, pork and profits

By Paul Driessen
internet posted February 12, 2007

The ink has barely dried on its new code of conduct, and already Congress is redefining ethics and pork to fit a global warming agenda. As Will Rogers observed, “with Congress, every time they make a joke, it is a law. And every time they make a law, it really is a joke.”

However, life-altering, economy-wrecking climate bills are no laughing matter. That’s why we want to recognize that the Kyoto Protocol and proposed “climate protection” laws will not stabilize the climate, even if CO2 is to blame. It’s why we should acknowledge that money to be created, and power to be gained, from climate alarmism and symbolism is a major purpose so several are finding on the climate “consensus” bandwagon.

In accusing ExxonMobil of giving “more than $ 19 million considering that the late 1990s” to public policy institutes that promote climate holocaust “denial,” Senate Inquisitors Olympia Snowe and Jay Rockefeller slandered each the donor and recipients. Moreover, this is less than half of what Pew Charitable Trusts and allied foundations contributed to the Pew Center on Climate Modify alone more than the exact same period. It’s a pittance compared to what US environmental groups spent propagating climate chaos scare stories.

It amounts to 30 cents for each $ 1,000 that the US, EU and UN spent since 1993 (some $ 80 billion all together) on global warming catastrophe study. And it ignores the truth that the Exxon grants also supported malaria control, Third World economic improvement and several other efforts.

Aside from honest, if unfounded, fears of climate disasters, why may other individuals assistance climate alarmism?

Scientists who use climate change to clarify environmental adjustments increase their chances of finding investigation grants from foundations, corporations – and US government programs that spending budget a whopping $ 6.5 billion for global warming in 2007. They also enhance the likelihood of finding headlines and quotes in news stories: “Climate alter threatens extinction of uncommon frogs, scientist says.” Climate disaster skeptics face an uphill battle on grants, headlines and quotes.

Politicians get to grandstand green credentials, cement relationships with activists who can assistance reelection campaigns and greater aspirations, magically transform $ 14-billion in option power pork into ethical planetary protection, and promote policies that otherwise would raise serious eyebrows.

Corporate actions that cause even one death are dealt with severely but praise is heaped on federal mileage standards that trigger hundreds of deaths, as automobiles are downsized and plasticized to save fuel and decrease emissions. High power costs are denounced at congressional hearings, if due to industry forces – but praised if imposed by government “to stop climate adjust.” Drilling in the Arctic or off our coasts is condemned, even to generate jobs, tax revenues and enhanced security but subsidizing wind power to produce two% of our electricity is lauded, even if giant turbines despoil millions of acres and kill millions of birds.

Alarmist rhetoric has also redefined corporate social responsibility, developed the Climate Action Partnership and launched the emerging Enviro-Industrial Complicated.

Environmental activists have turned climate fears into productive fund-raising tools – and a brilliant technique for achieving their dream of controlling international resource use, technological modify and economic development, by way of laws, treaties, regulations and pressure campaigns. Current developments promise to supercharge these efforts.

Environmental Defense is collaborating with Morgan Stanley, to promote emission trading systems and other climate modify initiatives – giving ED direct monetary and policy stakes in the banking, investment and political arenas, and in any carbon allowance or cap-and-trade programs Congress may well enact. Other environmental groups, organizations and Wall Street firms will no doubt adhere to their lead.

ED designed and led the disingenuous campaign that persuaded several healthcare agencies to ban DDT, resulting in millions of deaths from malaria. Greenpeace, Sierra Club, Union of Concerned Scientists, ED and other groups nevertheless post deceitful claims about DDT on their internet sites, further delaying progress against this killer illness. By blaming climate change for malaria, they deflect criticism for their vile actions.

Climate catastrophe claims enable activists to obtain official advisory status with companies and governments on environmental concerns. They also make it “ethical” for Rainforest Action Network and other pressure groups to oppose power generation in Third Globe nations, where handful of have access to electrical energy – and thereby keep communities perpetually impoverished.

Meanwhile, Prince Charles gets lionized for appropriating 62 1st class jetliner seats for his entourage of 20, on a trans-Atlantic trip to obtain an environmental prize and lecture Americans on saving the Earth – because at least he didn’t use his private jet.

Companies in the CAP and EIC can create and promote new product lines, using tax breaks, subsidies, legal mandates and regulatory provisions to acquire competitive benefits. They get favorable coverage from the media, and kid-glove therapy from members of Congress who routinely pillory climate chaos skeptics.

Some worry that this could grow to be a license to further redefine corporate ethics, present self-interest as planet-saving altruism, and profit from questionable arrangements with environmental groups and Congress. Definitely, cap-and-trade rules will generate useful property rights and reward organizations that reduce CO2 emissions, frequently by replacing old, inefficient, high-polluting plants that they want to retire anyway.

DuPont and BP will get funds for biofuels, GE for its portfolio of climate protection gear, ADM for ethanol, Lehman Brothers for emission trading and other deals. Environmental activists will be in a position to influence corporate, state and federal policy, and rake in nevertheless a lot more cash. Insurance firms can blame international warming for rate increases and coverage denials.

Lobbying and deal-brokering will enter a new era. As Thenardier the innkeeper observed in Les Miserables, “When it comes to fixing costs, there are lots of tricks he knows. Jees, it’s just amazing how it grows.” Indeed, the opportunities to “game the program” will be limited only by one’s “eco-magination.”

To determine the losers, look in the mirror. Activists and politicians are generating a Frankenstein climate monster on steroids. Had been it genuine, we’d need to have to dismantle our economy and living standards to slay the beast. How else could we eradicate 80–90% of US and EU fossil fuel emissions by 2050, to stabilize carbon dioxide emissions and (theoretically) a climate that has often been anything but stable?

Assume lifestyles circa 1900, or earlier. Ponder the British environment minister’s most recent prescription: Globe War II rationing, no meat or cheese, restrictions on air travel, no veggies that are not grown locally. France desires a new government agency that would single out, police and penalize countries that “abuse the Earth.” Other individuals want to put little solar panels on African huts, whilst kleptocratic dictators get millions of dollars for trading away their people’s appropriate to produce electrical energy and emit CO2.

We must enhance power efficiency, decrease pollution, and develop new power technologies. But when we demand immediate action to avoid exaggerated or imaginary crises, we stifle debate, railroad via programs that do not work, develop enough pork to fill 50 Chicago stockyards, and impose horrendous unintended consequences on numerous families. That is shortsighted and immoral.

Very best answer:

Answer by ♥Reids girl♥
i do

Know better? Leave your own answer in the comments!

Question by d h: How much do billionaires rely on their share values for their huge fortunes?
I.e. would Bill Gates lose a lot of dough if Microsoft’s stock crashed? He’s worth about $ 56 billion, but only has a salary of around $ 966,000, so clearly his shares are worth fairly a lot, also dictating his wealth Wikipedia says- “In 1999, Gates’s wealth briefly surpassed $ 100 billion causing him to be referred to in the media as a “centibillionaire”.[51] Considering that 2000, the nominal value of his Microsoft holdings has declined due to a fall in Microsoft’s stock price following the dot-com bubble and the multi-billion dollar donations he has made to his charitable foundations.”

So essentially, how significantly actual cash and other properties do these men and women have in comparison to the market place value of their stocks? Would they nevertheless be billionaires if their shares became worthless? Hope that all tends to make sense….thanks x

Ideal answer:

Answer by weatherman_1965
Virtually all very wealthy folks are that on paper only.

A crash in stock & property rates would wipe out a hell of a lot of of their net worth immediately.

Getting said that, if I had that amount of money I’d do the very same with fairly a bit of it, with the rest in high interest protected savings so I could live off the interest.

What do you believe? Answer below!

Question by Mystery Individual: Can you take into account becoming in a community musicals pit orchestra as “carrying out community service” and why?
I was in the my comunitys pit orchestra this year. In my chemistry class we can recieve additional credit for doing community service (i genuinely require it) but the dilemma is I’m not certain if you could contemplate being a musical pit orchestra a community service, please tell me soem reasons why or why not you can consider it comunnity service please!!!
OH and please no dumb answers like yes or no if you answer please give some reasons!!

Very best answer:

Answer by idic5
If you were not paid, Absolutely can be deemed C S. if pd, I am not sure – probably not.

Add your personal answer in the comments!

Question by Duane: What is yet another name for charity or “giving back”?
I am constructing a new net internet site that makes it possible for buyers to give a portion of what they devote to a charity, group, team, school, or keep it for themselves. I am searching for a name that defines charity or giving back. Could be a foreign word that signifies charity or could be some thing entirely different. What do you recommend the name be?

Very best answer:

Answer by ET
Philanthropy

Add your own answer in the comments!

Question by : When taking “donations” for on the internet services (video game) do you want to pay taxes on that income?
When taking “donations” for on the internet services (video game) will you need to have yo spend taxes on that revenue or is there no taxes necessary because it is a “gift” donation through paypal.

Very best answer:

Answer by Wayne Z
Just calling one thing a “gift” does not make it a gift.

If you are soliciting cash for services, it is earnings and, as such, subject to revenue tax.

Add your personal answer in the comments!

Question by Cleoppa: If you breed a litter of dogs what and how a lot do you feel is suitable to “give back” to dogs?
OK… do not know if that made sense. But I know that a lot of responsible breeders say issues like “I’ve rescued more dogs than I’ve bred” or “If you breed dogs you really should also be helping with the pet overpopulation difficulty.”

So I’m contemplating getting a dog. This would be a show dog who would be bred (soon after titles and genetic testing). I’m at the really early stages of even contemplating this, but I want to make confident I know precisely what I’d be finding in to.

This is a individual question. I know that nobody can say for someone else what is “adequate” in terms of “giving back” to dogs when you’ve created a litter of puppies.

But I do agree that if you generate a litter of puppies you ought to be responsible for those pups for their life and also do one thing for homeless dogs.

So, for you, what do you assume is proper to give back to dogs when you breed?

Best answer:

Answer by Mia C
IMO, you can give back to dogs by generating sure they get the greatest possible home with people who are knowledgeable with dogs and have a stable loved ones (not a couple who may possibly get divorced, a single person who works all of the time, men and women who want a dog since “it is what you do when you have a loved ones”) therefore, you will not be contributing to the pet overpopulation and you won’t have to be concerned as a lot about the pups ending up in shelters.

It really is up to you regardless of whether you make a decision to give back, if you are seeking into breeding and showing (which is very pricey, time consuming, but very rewarding) you could not have the space or expenses to rescue a lot of dogs to try and ‘make up’ for all the litters you generate.

Give your answer to this question below!