“If a man is valuable, his deeds will in some way outlive his life.” -Bill Loftus, Inventor

The Financial Freedom Foundation (F3) is a non-profit organization that teaches people how to create more passive income than their living expenses, so that they can quit living for a job and start dedicating their time and talents to giving back.

Personal financial independence is necessary in order to free up your time. However, financial independence is not the end goal, but rather an initial step, just the beginning step.

We’ll show you how to create $10k/month in passive income, so that you can cover your living expenses and quit your job, and then another $20k/month+ on top of that, so that you can have funds for helping other people. We have the tools to accomplish this, and we’ll show you exactly how to implement them. Money is very scalable, so you can actually get up into the millions, which will happen as your vision for what you want to accomplish increases.

Instead of trying to get wealthy people to become generous, we are teaching generous people how to create and control wealth, so that they can help others.

As to becoming a member in our Mastermind Group, we do not have any preferences as to age, gender, race, religion, level of education, or nationality … however, we are seeking people who:

• Are self-driven, independent thinkers who are decision makers
• Are happy living a moderate lifestyle, even if they were to make $1 million monthly
• Sincerely want to give back and help others
• Care about people more than they care about things
• Do not really care for status symbols, like yachts, mansions, or fancy cars
• Do not seek for the glory of the world, nor power, nor fame
• View money as a stewardship rather than a prize
• View money as a tool rather than a goal
• Are comfortable taking initiative, calling the shots, and not having a boss
• Can create their own vision and run their own humanitarian projects
• Are okay with giving anonymously and not having the spotlight trained on them
• Are willing to learn

If this does not describe you, don’t bother to continue reading.

If this does describe you, then please download the information in our Free Report and continue forward in our screening process.

We hand select people to join our Mastermind Group. If you would like to be considered, we ask you to:

1. Read our Free Reports,
2. Read our Details page, and
3. Complete the essays in our Membership Application Form

(The links to access the Details page and the Membership Application Form are found in the Free Reports, which you can access by entering your Name and Email address in the box to the upper right and clicking the “Give Me My Free Report Now” button)

We believe that it is the personal responsibility of private citizens to care for the poor, the hungry, the homeless, the sick, and the elderly. We invite people to take more initiative in doing so, using their private sector skill sets to do this more effectively. We believe that the solutions to global poverty, world hunger, homelessness, and almost all our social, physical, mental, and economic problems rest in the hearts and minds of private individuals acting generously.

If you are ready to move to the next step, please download the Free Report now, using the box to the upper right.

“Never doubt that a small band of committed individuals can change the world. Indeed, it is the only thing that ever has.” -Margaret Mead












Legal Disclaimer: The Financial Freedom Foundation is not a United States Securities Dealer, Broker or US Investment Adviser. Forex, futures, stock, and options trading are not appropriate for everyone. Trading and investing in the stock, Forex, futures, and options markets have large potential rewards. However, there is also a substantial risk of loss associated with trading these markets. Losses can and will occur. You are solely responsible for any losses as a result of trading. Never put your money on the line without an understanding of what you are doing, and why you are doing it, based on your own personal knowledge and experience. Results, depicted above are unique to the user. Your personal results will vary. You could make more, less, or even lose money. No system or methodology has ever been developed that can guarantee profits. No representation or implication is being made that using the information will generate profits or ensure freedom from losses. Traders should consult their own financial advisers regarding any securities transaction, and be responsible for their own investment decisions.





Query by PNAC ~ Penelope: Why do LIBERALS call CONSERVATIVES ‘Greedy’?
“But what genuinely astounded him was the quantity of giving: In 2000, he says, conservative households gave 30 percent far more cash to charity than liberal households.”

“It’s down the line,” he says. “Religious people are 21 percent much more most likely to volunteer in explicitly secular causes. They are even twice as likely to donate blood.”

http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/opinion/298992_givemoney10.html

Bible Belt most generous in charitable giving

“PORTLAND, Maine (AP) — New Englanders remain among the most tightfisted in the country when it comes to charitable giving although Bible Belt residents are amongst the most generous, according to an annual index.

http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2005-11-20-national-giving_x.htm

http://www.catalogueforphilanthropy.org/cfp/generosity_index/

Greatest answer:

Answer by Sway_27
Liberals really feel you must be forced to give up your funds, they dont account for the charity you currently voluntarily give to organizations who are far much more efficient than the gubment

Know much better? Leave your personal answer in the comments!

Question by redstaterandy: Are LIBERALS greedy & selfish?
(Why do not they give to Charity?)

Bible Belt most generous in charitable giving

“PORTLAND, Maine (AP) — New Englanders stay among the most
tightfisted in the country when it comes to charitable giving whilst
Bible Belt residents are among the most generous, according to an
annual index.
For the fourth year operating, New Hampshire was the most miserly
state, according to the Catalogue of Philanthropy’s Generosity
Index. Mississippi remained at the top for generosity.

The index, which takes into account both “getting” and “giving,” is
based on typical adjusted gross incomes and the value of itemized
charitable donations reported to the Internal Income Service on
2003 tax returns, the newest accessible.”

http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2005-11-20-national-giving_x.htm

http://www.catalogueforphilanthropy.org/cfp/generosity_index/

Conservatives are not a selfish lot

By ANDREW FERGUSON

“But what genuinely astounded him was the quantity of giving: In 2000, he
says, conservative households gave 30 percent much more income to charity
than liberal households.”

“It’s down the line,” he says. “Religious folks are 21 percent more
most likely to volunteer in explicitly secular causes. They are even twice
as likely to donate blood.”

http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/opinion/298992_givemoney10.html

Here’s a snippet:

Conservatives not only donate a lot more cash to charity than liberals
do, conservatives volunteer much more time as nicely. A lot more conservatives
than liberals also donate blood.

According to Professor Brooks: “If liberals and moderates gave blood
at the exact same rate as conservatives, the blood provide of the United
States would jump about 45 percent.”

Professor Brooks admits that the details he uncovered had been the
opposite of what he expected – so much so that he went back and
checked again.

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2006/11/who_actually_cares.ht

ml
In 1991 and 1995 (the year of the OK City Bombing when donations to
the Red Cross poured in) John F. Kerry had incomes of $ 113,857 and
126,179 respectively. In those two years, Kerry donated a whopping
total of, drum roll please – $ total to charity . No, that’s not a
misprint – its zip, zero, zilch, nil, nada, no mas, the big donut,
the collar (to use a baseball term).

As far as George W. Bush is concerned, in 1991, the future
president, then a private citizen, reportedly had revenue of
$ 179,591, and charitable contributions of $ 28,236. In 1992, Bush
reported income of $ 212.313, and contributions of $ 31,914. In 1993,
Bush reported revenue of $ 610,772, and contributions of $ 31,292. In
1994, Bush reported revenue of $ 474,937 and in 1995, income of
$ 419,481.

http://www.ariannaonline.com/forums/archive/index.php/t-2399.html

http://christiancadre.blogspot.com/2004/11/1-last-believed-on-

kerrys-religious.html
Dick Cheney – The ultimate ‘greedy’ republican!

“The Cheneys donated just under $ six.87 million to charity from the
stock alternatives and royalties from Mrs. Cheney’s books. That left
about $ 1.9 million in earnings on which the Cheney’s owed $ 529,636 in
taxes.”

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/12318056/

Finest answer:

Answer by KiKi
Several folks regardless of political association gives to charity. Its not a political factor its a personal issue. Think outside the box next time please

Know much better? Leave your own answer in the comments!

Question by enlightenment: Why did James Baker III give Saddam permission on behalf of the US to invade Kuwait in 1990?
Now his law firm is representing Saudi Arabia in a law suit by Sept. 11 victims families who are looking for to get access to the Congress’s official report that says Saudi Arabia gave “charitable donations” to needy terrorists.

Greatest answer:

Answer by Ozymandius
I think the word it… ‘Schiester’

Folks are stupid, get used to it.

Know much better? Leave your own answer in the comments!

Question by looking_please: Are you a “giving” American?
I know I am giving til it hurts! Please let us know if you donate to charitable causes and, if you do not mind, what nationality you are.

“Americans gave twice as much as next most charitable country”

http://www.cnn.com/2007/US/06/25/charitable.giving.ap/index.html

Very best answer:

Answer by Kev
I want to be but proper now I’m not

Add your personal answer in the comments!

Question by fstreet111: Considering that it is Christmas, the “season of giving”, which political party would you say is the most self-centered?
By “self-centered” I mean that the people in the party feel primarily of themselves and don’t care about other people, be they homeless, dis-advantaged, unemployed, or poor. Which is the least charitable party? Please if possible give examples. Thanks!

Greatest answer:

Answer by BSTinasMan
Definately Republican. I.E. just read the news, about all of the healthcare and educational bills that congress passes only to have Bush shoot down. Bush, anti-education? Who’da accomplished thunk it?!

Know far better? Leave your own answer in the comments!

Question by Curtis Edward Clark: I hate the phrase “giving back”. Do not you think it is merely act of “giving”?
Folks like Haley Barry and other celebrities, and even we regular people who do a lot of charitable work, are said to be “giving back”. I didn’t take something. I don’t think Halley Barry took something except what she deserved–a massive paycheck and fame, for a job nicely done.

You do not have to agree with me. I just want to hear all the different opinions on this.

Finest answer:

Answer by Stephen
You misunderstand the phrase, I believe.

Giving back implies giving back to the community. Since we are profitable members of society, we ought to do our very best to help other individuals less fortunate. It is not ‘because I earn income, I must give funds away’. It is more ‘Because I have been produced effective, I should give some of that succcess to others’. It is kinda hard to explain quickly, this link explains it far better :

What do you believe? Answer beneath!

Question by ciaobella: How significantly funds “ought to” a person donate to charitable causes?
John Stossel of 20/20 did a news piece on being stingy in America and he revealed that individuals making under $ 30k donates a bigger percentage of their revenue than folks producing $ 40 to $ 99K.

Now to you folks who do not take into account yourselves “Scrooges”, how a lot of percent of earnings do u assume a decent person really should give? “Really should” meaning philosophically.
Thank you. I figured I’d get some believed-out answers by posting in “community service”. When I say “really should” I do not mean “peer pressure”, “law” or “feelings”, which are valid considerations, but I was thinking about plain “responsibility” as a human getting who sees need to have and desires to do his portion to make the world just a little much less crappy. Not all of us are religous…to just go by feelings is not very good, since our feelings are fickle. I mean I can’t refuse to go choose up my kid from school, because I don’t really feel like it today.

Greatest answer:

Answer by igi
10%

Know far better? Leave your own answer in the comments!

Question by Cowardly Yamster: If tithing is just “freely giving,” does charitable donation count?
I was told that it is freely giving:

http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index_ylt=AtMdQx1PTQjPxPwkD_4sGzfsy6IX_ylv=3?qid=20080224165751AAJVdpb

so does any sort of charitable donation count? What if I give to the campaign for equal rights for gays (Human Rights Campaign)? What if I give to Planned Parenthood? What about an atheist charity (Gates foundation)? Do THOSE donations count?

Greatest answer:

Answer by mamasquirrel
Jesus only said “give to the poor”.

He didn’t say, “You have to give by way of your church.”

So, whatever you choose…its your option.

Give your answer to this question below!

Charlotte, NC (PRWEB) November twenty, 2007

Us citizens spent far more in two months on holiday objects than they did all year on charitable supplying in 2006. Getaway retail revenue for November and December 2006 in the general merchandise group have been up about four.six %, totaling roughly $ 456 billion, according to the Nationwide Retail Federation. Charitable giving for 2006 set a report, topping $ 300 billion.

“I started a plan known as Vacation For Charity in 2002 since I imagined that Us residents should be giving at minimum as considerably to charity as they are investing on holiday getaway gifts,” says Harry Hoover, companion of My Innovative Team. “We have seen some hefty boosts in charitable giving and I hope that folks will continue to give to charity as they did last year. The Holiday For Charity software provides some basic approaches to help the a lot less fortunate.”

Here’s how Holiday For Charity works:

consult close friends, loved ones and enterprise associates to donate to a charity as an alternative of acquiring you vacation gifts&#thirteen
sell the holiday presents you receive online at eBay’s GivingWorks, http://pages.ebay.com/givingworks, and donate the proceeds to charity
sign-up and shop at iGive.com, whose merchants donate a portion of each transaction to the charities of your option &#thirteen
offer you to do volunteer function in lieu of acquiring holiday getaway gifts&#thirteen
donate straight to charity in lieu of purchasing holiday getaway gifts for customers and clients

Hoover has unique Getaway For Charity details on the My Inventive Crew weblog, http://www.my-creativeteam.com/weblog, to fully explain the software and present hyperlinks to charitable resources.

My Innovative Team, http://www.My-CreativeTeam.com, is a Charlotte, NC area network of hugely skilled and proficient independent pros that provides consumers greater work which is a much better value. The advert company delivers wonderful perform, on time and on target, and that helps make the client glimpse very good.

Providers incorporate turnkey website advancement and advertising, presentation improvement, electronic mail advertising and marketing packages, pay out-per-click on advertising, advertising and marketing, media preparing and purchasing, PR, and video production. Customers array from Jacobsen, National Gypsum and Rubbermaid to Financial institution of Commerce and Target 4.

&#thirteen

# # #

&#thirteen

Locate More Charitable Providing Press Releases

Question by American citizen and taxpayer: Arwe the deductions for mortgage loan interest, state and local taxes and charitable providing “loopholes”?
Why or why not? I realize they are all underneath consideration for modifications in the Senate spending budget strategy.

http://www.startribune.com/nation/125919418.html

Best remedy:

Answer by John H
Yep. They ARE “loopholes”. They ended up put into area for 1 function and one particular objective only, to buy VOTES from particular curiosity groups, as are ALL deductions in the tax code.

Include your personal reply in the feedback!