.png){kind=logo}
“If a man is valuable, his deeds will in some way outlive his life.” -Bill Loftus, Inventor
The Financial Freedom Foundation (F3) is a non-profit organization that teaches people how to create more passive income than their living expenses, so that they can quit living for a job and start dedicating their time and talents to giving back.
Personal financial independence is necessary in order to free up your time. However, financial independence is not the end goal, but rather an initial step, just the beginning step.
We’ll show you how to create $10k/month in passive income, so that you can cover your living expenses and quit your job, and then another $20k/month+ on top of that, so that you can have funds for helping other people. We have the tools to accomplish this, and we’ll show you exactly how to implement them. Money is very scalable, so you can actually get up into the millions, which will happen as your vision for what you want to accomplish increases.
Instead of trying to get wealthy people to become generous, we are teaching generous people how to create and control wealth, so that they can help others.
As to becoming a member in our Mastermind Group, we do not have any preferences as to age, gender, race, religion, level of education, or nationality … however, we are seeking people who:
If this does not describe you, don’t bother to continue reading.
If this does describe you, then please download the information in our Free Report and continue forward in our screening process.
We hand select people to join our Mastermind Group. If you would like to be considered, we ask you to:
(The links to access the Details page and the Membership Application Form are found in the Free Reports, which you can access by entering your Name and Email address in the box to the upper right and clicking the “Give Me My Free Report Now” button)
We believe that it is the personal responsibility of private citizens to care for the poor, the hungry, the homeless, the sick, and the elderly. We invite people to take more initiative in doing so, using their private sector skill sets to do this more effectively. We believe that the solutions to global poverty, world hunger, homelessness, and almost all our social, physical, mental, and economic problems rest in the hearts and minds of private individuals acting generously.
If you are ready to move to the next step, please download the Free Report now, using the box to the upper right.
“Never doubt that a small band of committed individuals can change the world. Indeed, it is the only thing that ever has.” -Margaret Mead
Legal Disclaimer: The Financial Freedom Foundation is not a United States Securities Dealer, Broker or US Investment Adviser. Forex, futures, stock, and options trading are not appropriate for everyone. Trading and investing in the stock, Forex, futures, and options markets have large potential rewards. However, there is also a substantial risk of loss associated with trading these markets. Losses can and will occur. You are solely responsible for any losses as a result of trading. Never put your money on the line without an understanding of what you are doing, and why you are doing it, based on your own personal knowledge and experience. Results, depicted above are unique to the user. Your personal results will vary. You could make more, less, or even lose money. No system or methodology has ever been developed that can guarantee profits. No representation or implication is being made that using the information will generate profits or ensure freedom from losses. Traders should consult their own financial advisers regarding any securities transaction, and be responsible for their own investment decisions.
Question by sound_of_the_silenced3: Do men and women contribute much less to charity when they think it really is the “governments job” to look soon after the poor?
Be it with money or time………
Best answer:
Answer by Tiny Tim
Possibly- but the poor can have dignity if they have some minimal rights.
“CHARITY” typically doesn’t let that. Welfare states are not charities.
What do you feel? Answer below!
Other articles you might like;
Related posts:
Comments are closed.
Jon J Dec 30 2011 - 9:28 am
They do, but the government also does a better job of providing education, health-care, basic subsistence living than private charity does.
Food Fight Dec 30 2011 - 10:21 am
Well that depends. I think it is the government’s job but where I am at right now the government only has a budget of a couple of million. Over the Easter weekend I personally served great meals to ten people who were homeless and hungry in my Restaurant that is not opened yet for four days. It was not purely altruistic. I got to try out recipes and equipment. I will try to do more later. But as you can see from the fact that those ten people are hungry right now the government would do a better job if it taxed people. Where I live right now the government has very low taxes and the people will work for 150 dollars per month. There is just a flat tax on consumption.
Huggy Dec 30 2011 - 11:03 am
Conservatives are always giving to charity. Not liberals.
crow t robot Dec 30 2011 - 12:03 pm
sadly yes
Seiko . Dec 30 2011 - 12:35 pm
Yep, look at which political ideology gives more.
Dr. Killpatient Dec 30 2011 - 1:12 pm
They contribute less when they are in financial trouble because of the recession…. Reagan asked private charity to step up to help the poor, while he gave the rich a tax cut….
chin Dec 30 2011 - 1:16 pm
How could it be otherwise. Not only does taxation towards social welfare programs leave people with less disposable income that they could otherwise possibly donate it also gives people the false impression that the problem of poverty is currently being solved. Perhaps as little as 20 percent of every tax dollar that ostensibly is designated for social welfare actually reaches its intended targets (the rest squandered in bureaucratic waste) contrasted by 85 or so percent efficiency from private charity. Even if only a small percentage of people increased their charitable output absent the state welfare, there would still be a net gain in efficiency. Not only that, state welfare schemes don’t lend themselves to a civil society rather they are impersonal and make people suspicious of one another because they are concerned about free riders and abuse of the system.
The Random Idiot Dec 30 2011 - 2:09 pm
People contribute less when they have less money, like when they are being taxed into oblivion and making less money because of a recession. It was never and isn’t the job of the government to take care of the poor.