.png){kind=logo}
“If a man is valuable, his deeds will in some way outlive his life.” -Bill Loftus, Inventor
The Financial Freedom Foundation (F3) is a non-profit organization that teaches people how to create more passive income than their living expenses, so that they can quit living for a job and start dedicating their time and talents to giving back.
Personal financial independence is necessary in order to free up your time. However, financial independence is not the end goal, but rather an initial step, just the beginning step.
We’ll show you how to create $10k/month in passive income, so that you can cover your living expenses and quit your job, and then another $20k/month+ on top of that, so that you can have funds for helping other people. We have the tools to accomplish this, and we’ll show you exactly how to implement them. Money is very scalable, so you can actually get up into the millions, which will happen as your vision for what you want to accomplish increases.
Instead of trying to get wealthy people to become generous, we are teaching generous people how to create and control wealth, so that they can help others.
As to becoming a member in our Mastermind Group, we do not have any preferences as to age, gender, race, religion, level of education, or nationality … however, we are seeking people who:
If this does not describe you, don’t bother to continue reading.
If this does describe you, then please download the information in our Free Report and continue forward in our screening process.
We hand select people to join our Mastermind Group. If you would like to be considered, we ask you to:
(The links to access the Details page and the Membership Application Form are found in the Free Reports, which you can access by entering your Name and Email address in the box to the upper right and clicking the “Give Me My Free Report Now” button)
We believe that it is the personal responsibility of private citizens to care for the poor, the hungry, the homeless, the sick, and the elderly. We invite people to take more initiative in doing so, using their private sector skill sets to do this more effectively. We believe that the solutions to global poverty, world hunger, homelessness, and almost all our social, physical, mental, and economic problems rest in the hearts and minds of private individuals acting generously.
If you are ready to move to the next step, please download the Free Report now, using the box to the upper right.
“Never doubt that a small band of committed individuals can change the world. Indeed, it is the only thing that ever has.” -Margaret Mead
Legal Disclaimer: The Financial Freedom Foundation is not a United States Securities Dealer, Broker or US Investment Adviser. Forex, futures, stock, and options trading are not appropriate for everyone. Trading and investing in the stock, Forex, futures, and options markets have large potential rewards. However, there is also a substantial risk of loss associated with trading these markets. Losses can and will occur. You are solely responsible for any losses as a result of trading. Never put your money on the line without an understanding of what you are doing, and why you are doing it, based on your own personal knowledge and experience. Results, depicted above are unique to the user. Your personal results will vary. You could make more, less, or even lose money. No system or methodology has ever been developed that can guarantee profits. No representation or implication is being made that using the information will generate profits or ensure freedom from losses. Traders should consult their own financial advisers regarding any securities transaction, and be responsible for their own investment decisions.
Question by Chuckles (Warrior Poet): why is “socialism” such a bad factor?
i mean the principal is basically for the government to take care of its men and women, offer basic wants and services at the community’s expense… i mean a lengthy time ago when we initial formed governments people possibly got the thought “hey instead of hunting all the time, we could all hunt together and share the food so we all can eat not just those individuals who find meat” i mean in a sense the government need to serve the individuals not the other way around… i mean what would be bad with a socialist democracy? i mean with revisionalist socialism, a free marketplace would nonetheless prosper just those on the bottom would be able to survive, revisonalist socialism builds on the current method and if a base package is established, our companies would have to work tougher to offer top quality goods and services and could charge much more instead of mediocre ones for minimum like they do now…. seems practically utopian to me
Greatest answer:
Answer by Les Klaypool
It`s just very extremely naughty….Besides, we already have it with our tax code.
Know far better? Leave your own answer in the comments!
Other articles you might like;
No related posts.
Comments are closed.
Think Outside the Ballot Box Sep 24 2011 - 3:12 pm
Your recollection of how government formed is entirely inaccurate.
Tribal hunter/gatherers always worked cooperatively and did so without any form of coercive government or established social contract. Government was born with agriculture and subsequent civilization. The problem with socialism is that it tries to bring about cooperation WITHIN the system of civilization, which is coercion. The problem with capitalism is that it does not involve cooperation at all.
How would I know Sep 24 2011 - 3:23 pm
The basic premise of socialist amounts to punishing people for success and rewarding people for failure. It cannot ever improve the overall condition, it can only make everybody equally poor and miserable.
And to make that even worse, you need to have a strong, totalitarian government to force the punishment on people who dare rise above the dregs. The people who are forcing people to be equally poor, gain power and become rich ( and untouchable ) themselves.
Bob J Sep 24 2011 - 3:44 pm
Government cannot take care of its people they can only take someone else’s property and give it to another. In doing so it removes any incentive for the first to earn the property. It’s such a bad thing because it doesn’t work.
EDY L Sep 24 2011 - 4:17 pm
It wouldn’t work with our society.
Ideally, a larger reward is given to the person that gives a larger effort.
If everyone has the exact same payment, then the same paycheck given to an honest, hardworking individual would be given to the guy that is lazy and never lifts a finger. How does that encourage better efforts?
In the world where governmental bodies are unreliable, you have to be willing to work for what you get. The world does NOT revolve around YOU. Temporary housing is TEMPORARY. Retired men/women have what they have because they EARNED it during their working years.
Do you understand?
Daniel Fellows Sep 24 2011 - 4:54 pm
Socialism in its Purest form is extremely Admirable, where everyone works together to better Society as a whole, However unfortunately it has never worked our that way, every time it gets implemented we end up seeing countries like the Soviet Union or China, occasionally we get somewhat stable countries(like in Europe) even though its still not a very good implementation in Europe, In the end Socialism fails because its too easy to corrupt and to difficult to implement successfully!
Social Democrat Sep 24 2011 - 5:24 pm
IT is not, Socialism is to protect the normal and poor people. And yes it is fair to the one who gain more to pay more because they actually use the common wealth which is property of the public.
IF the public decided to spare various types of industry from taxation (through democratic procedure) then it is their own business, but they decided to take some then it is not theft. They just take their own share for being the owners of the wealth.
And if taxation is a theft then small thefts (small taxation) should be outlawed because it is still a theft even if it was small ! ! ! !