.png){kind=logo}
“If a man is valuable, his deeds will in some way outlive his life.” -Bill Loftus, Inventor
The Financial Freedom Foundation (F3) is a non-profit organization that teaches people how to create more passive income than their living expenses, so that they can quit living for a job and start dedicating their time and talents to giving back.
Personal financial independence is necessary in order to free up your time. However, financial independence is not the end goal, but rather an initial step, just the beginning step.
We’ll show you how to create $10k/month in passive income, so that you can cover your living expenses and quit your job, and then another $20k/month+ on top of that, so that you can have funds for helping other people. We have the tools to accomplish this, and we’ll show you exactly how to implement them. Money is very scalable, so you can actually get up into the millions, which will happen as your vision for what you want to accomplish increases.
Instead of trying to get wealthy people to become generous, we are teaching generous people how to create and control wealth, so that they can help others.
As to becoming a member in our Mastermind Group, we do not have any preferences as to age, gender, race, religion, level of education, or nationality … however, we are seeking people who:
If this does not describe you, don’t bother to continue reading.
If this does describe you, then please download the information in our Free Report and continue forward in our screening process.
We hand select people to join our Mastermind Group. If you would like to be considered, we ask you to:
(The links to access the Details page and the Membership Application Form are found in the Free Reports, which you can access by entering your Name and Email address in the box to the upper right and clicking the “Give Me My Free Report Now” button)
We believe that it is the personal responsibility of private citizens to care for the poor, the hungry, the homeless, the sick, and the elderly. We invite people to take more initiative in doing so, using their private sector skill sets to do this more effectively. We believe that the solutions to global poverty, world hunger, homelessness, and almost all our social, physical, mental, and economic problems rest in the hearts and minds of private individuals acting generously.
If you are ready to move to the next step, please download the Free Report now, using the box to the upper right.
“Never doubt that a small band of committed individuals can change the world. Indeed, it is the only thing that ever has.” -Margaret Mead
Legal Disclaimer: The Financial Freedom Foundation is not a United States Securities Dealer, Broker or US Investment Adviser. Forex, futures, stock, and options trading are not appropriate for everyone. Trading and investing in the stock, Forex, futures, and options markets have large potential rewards. However, there is also a substantial risk of loss associated with trading these markets. Losses can and will occur. You are solely responsible for any losses as a result of trading. Never put your money on the line without an understanding of what you are doing, and why you are doing it, based on your own personal knowledge and experience. Results, depicted above are unique to the user. Your personal results will vary. You could make more, less, or even lose money. No system or methodology has ever been developed that can guarantee profits. No representation or implication is being made that using the information will generate profits or ensure freedom from losses. Traders should consult their own financial advisers regarding any securities transaction, and be responsible for their own investment decisions.
Question by roostershine: How does “professional-organization” grow to be so gloriously anti-social?
“professional-expansion”
Competitive enterprise and the ordinary blend of disparity are not problematic at all.
And nevertheless I witness a splendidly simple sort of worship of a thing that is a complete other animal altogether in some way.
Our political arena oozes with it like a hemoraging hemopheliac wandering aimlessly about in dread of the slightest bump.
This is a tough query of program, to locate the words for what I want to inquire. I will probably have to reword it. But I am giving it a very first shot for correct now.
Your best thoughts
Your fifty percent-ideas,
all greatly appreciated.
It is as if the wrath of the gods will punish a nation for arranging Something.
Exporting of democracy. Now there’s a concept. Very good new spot to commence. Reading through… I like in which this is heading.
“When any otherwise audio standpoint- “
Oh, that’s just exceptional. I really like it.
It matches nicely on how desparate abrupt ideologic /innovative forcing of markets gave this kind of failure in the earlier century too.
Lovely!
Balanced.
Greatest solution:
Remedy by superpolitics
The United States’ exporting of “democracy” is the dissemination of worldwide capitalism. Global capitalism, what a lot of the entire world calls neo-liberalism, demands huge and continued exploitation of normal resources. The mass production of merchandise and companies for the purpose of at any time-growing profits calls for that commodities be swiftly available so that they might be exchanged for a lot more excess funds, i.e., surplus value or profit. This cycle should be repeated in excess of and over for profits to not only continue, but to increase. Elizabeth Martinez and Arnoldo García, creating in “What is neo-liberalism? A brief definition” (International Economic climate 101, 2000) level out the five factors of neo-liberalism:
The rule of the marketplace.
Reducing expenditure for social providers.
Deregulation.
Privatisation
Getting rid of the idea of “the public very good” or “group”.
The approach of transforming dollars into commodities, then commodities into funds necessitates that there exist a continual demand for the commodity. It does not make any difference regardless of whether the commodity is necessary, only that that it be sold. That is, there requirements to be a desire for the solution. It does not make a difference whether the demand is actual or contrived. The ongoing desire for commodities needs that the consumption of the natural resources that make it doable not only continue, but that the charge of usage continues to improve along with it. It does not make a difference that men and women die as a consequence of the commodity-money-commodity exchange.
War is a commodity as are the weapons that make it doable. It is inconsequential that civilians die in a war like Iraq which has been likely in since 1991. “Shock and awe” showed the planet that folks are of small concern to neo-liberalism. What issues is that the supply of goods that make war doable be consumed so that a lot more war products can be made. More war goods developed and offered means a lot more revenue. Combating a nebulous unending war on “terrorism” insures that war and profit carry on in perpetuity. “Terrorism” has replaced “communism” as a explanation to proceed the military industrial sophisticated humming. Nations with economies that survive on for-revenue war creating are not bothered by the penalties of war, the collateral harm. It does not make a difference if one-50 percent million Iraqi young children die as a result of sanctions. It does not issue that people turn into contaminated with depleted uranium? It does not make a difference that hundreds-of-hundreds, or millions of civilians die. It does not make any difference that US war casualties come home in containers in the darkness of night. People who do not serve the neo-liberalism technique are impediments to the constant approach of the commodity exchange system. Surplus value issues. Human beings do not.
Give your answer to this question under!
Other articles you might like;
No related posts.
Comments are closed.
rsist34 Jan 24 2010 - 10:11 am
because business men/woman are perceived as being rich
crabby_blindguy Jan 24 2010 - 10:49 am
When any otherwise sound perspective–in economics or anything else–ceases to be a reasoned approach and degenrates into an ideological doctrine bereft of logic or judgement,, and immune to challenge or dissent it becomes destructive.
Mister2-15-2 Jan 24 2010 - 11:21 am
A large percentage of business was not pro social or anti-social, than along came Reagan and Republicans, and if you you did good pro social policies using magic wand people could use money you put aside for employee pensions and health care– to buy your business and f**^ employees. NAFTA and fast track produced trade policies that give us third world working conditions. Changing definition of long and short term investment and increasing detectability or lowing taxes on short term rewarded those that just wanted fast buck and F society. Get rid of fing greedy hogs and business gets along nicely with society, but Look at the carnage W Buffet has caused along with many greed is good venture capulateist. Through out most of USA History they were held in check with laws. These people would not invest in the first place if they were not going to make some money. It was mostly Republicans with some Democrats that let the FGH take over.
DCCIII Jan 24 2010 - 12:16 pm
A well know incident occurred when a Gnostic carpenter cast the “moneymongers”, “warmongers”, and “whoremongers” out of the local watering hole!
These barbarous Canaanites continue their same practice today; we call them Bilderbergs who follow Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion
http://www.skrewdriver.net/protoc.html
R B Jan 24 2010 - 12:56 pm
Your English is not very good,but when competitive enterprise is accountable for thousands upon thousands of deaths,how can it be considered a good thing?