Question by ★Expectorate★: Why is not becoming necessary to join a union and not getting forced to pay union dues regarded as “Union Busting”?
Shouldn’t joining Unions be a voluntary factor not be a requirement to get a job? Isn’t this a lot more like extortion?
Libs hold whining that the republicans are union busting simply because of “proper to operate” laws that don’t allow this union extortion.
Don’t you locate it irritating that libs walk that fine line and say “you do not have to join a union to get a job” which genuinely signifies “you have to get a non union job and then you discovered a job where you did not have to join the union”
Fundamentally for most union jobs you have no choice, you have to join the Union and are essential to spend the union fees or else you cannot operate there. If you quit paying union fees you are literally “fired” by the union and they will sue you for the lost costs.
Liberal logic at it is finest…..
And then there is: “you ought to pay for the union benefits”
HINT: The Indiana “right to work” law does not need unions to supply advantages to non union individuals.
Answer by NOT!
Libs feel unions extorting dues must be a requirement to get a job.
How else would the Unions extravagently fund the libs?
Truly? – It is obvious you are Genuinely? clueless and quite a loon to boot.
Know better? Leave your personal answer in the comments!
Comments are closed.